Sunday, 8 February 2015

RUBY CANARY REAL ESSAY for english coursework

Change uncanny to conscious/sub????


Ruby Canary

‘The greatest source of terror in Gothic Literature is the Self.’ To what extent do the works of Robert Browning, Robert Louis Stevenson and Angela Carter support this point of view?

The Self is how we all identify ourselves individually, it is our thoughts, perceptions and emotions; 'the self is therefore an "immediate given"' (wiki) The Self learns through human experience and thoughts, our thoughts are ours alone so the only definition of ourselves/ The Self is our own, alone. The self will always continue to hold awe over humans as we try to discover our enlightenment, to understand that we are a mystery to ourselves, The Self proves itself as a source of terror as we do not know who we really are.

The terror of the self can be explored through the Freudian uncanny; throughout the works of all authors Browning, Stevenson and Carter as we learn the character of the uncanny presents itself as wary, scary and unfamiliar characters in all of the author's writings, creating fear in the works of literature to a huge extent, and the uncanniness in the Self. In addition, the haunting theme of animalistic qualities prove to be a threat to our readings of the three authors, the inhumane and raw unevolved passions in the Self give the impression of a backwards and unstable species who cannot control themselves, proving fear to our safety and terror to the gothic. Lastly it is fair to mention that society's norms are creeping into the terror of the self in gothic literature to a huge extent in the mentioned works, the outsider of society can be used as the example to show the individuality of humans, the unpredictability of us, and how we are shunned by each other if we chose to be different. Overall, this essay will delve into how much of an extent the works of Carter, Browning and Stevenson support the view that these three key points identify how the Self is the greatest sense of terror in gothic literature.


The theory of the Uncanny, a concept further developed by Sigmund Freud, published 'Das Unheimliche' (1919) which translates to "the opposite of what is familiar"/ 'unhomely' examines the uncanny and how it’s something that is so close to home that it is ‘unhomely’, examples being dolls, automatons, deformed or deceased human bodies, robots, and figures that are resembling to the human appearance. 
Earlier works by Jentsch, quoted by Freud examines "the uncanny would always, as it were, be something one does not know one’s way about in", this can further imply the same truth about the Self, suggesting the uncanny aspect in The Self. The works of Carter, Stevenson and Browning highlight the popular gothic convention of the uncanny with analysis on The Self to prove the gothic convention as a terror. 

The uncanny is seen as a truly evil convention in the works of R.L Stevenson, 'The Strange case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde'. The character of Mr. Hyde is defiantly classed as the 'uncanny', Mr. Hyde is physically attributed as stated; 'The other snarled aloud into a hissing laugh' the description of 'the other' is a synonym for Mr. Hyde as an uncanny, Mr. Utterson in this quote does not name him as 'the man' or 'he' as a correct counterpart, which suggests Mr. Hyde is not a man or a gentleman as Mr. Utterson cannot comprehend exactly what Hyde is, showing Hyde a fit representation of the uncanny. Additionally, 'if ever I read Satan’s signature upon a face' Mr. Utterson remarks of Mr. Hyde, this strongly identifies and pictures how evil Mr. Hyde is to the reader. Mr. Utterson is suggesting that Hyde is the work of the devil himself this alone is suggesting how disgusting and demonic an appearance of the uncanny can be examined, as Mr. Utterson cannot comprehend exactly what Hyde is, it can be suggested he is then seen as something of a devious creation; a common conception for misunderstood concepts for Victorian times. But also, how the human with a conscious (unlike Hyde) can identify if slightly, how something doesn’t sit right instinctively or subconsciously. It can be evaluated then, as Mr. Hyde is part of Dr. Jekyll, he is not fully human, and therefore he lacks a conscious. Stephen LeDrew furthers "for Freud the experience of uncanniness is linked to unconscious desires and beliefs that are repressed or surmounted..through the prodding of the work of uncanny texts, find their way back into consciousness and produce that discomfort," This implies how the Mr. Hyde is found as 'the other' and 'the outsider' in the sense of repression, as he purely demonstrates his raw desires split from Dr. Jekyll it can be analysed from this that Hyde is the representative of the sub-conscious as it, given the chance will unrepressed carry out the raw desires of the mind.

The works of Browning, demonstrates how the uncanny appears through the poem of 'Porphyria's lover', with the examination of the woman Porphyria, as a mental illness. Contextually speaking 'Porphyria' is a disease that causes hallucinations and death, it can be suggested that through this poem she is the speaker's mental illness. Porphyria is suggested as a comforting, sexual, and warm figure to the speaker 'She shut the cold out and the storm,' is our first suggestion that she is a comfort and relaxes the speaker, and that the  chaos in his mind is relaxed by her 'from the storm'. Additionally, the conception of the sexual imagery is suggested that she is tempting him into giving into his mental illness. 'She put my arm about her waist,
   And made her smooth white shoulder bare,' 'bare' suggests the uncanny element of un-repression, by openly showing herself to the man, it can be suggested that she is teasing him to give into his raw desires the ID, through the temptation of Porphyria. In addition, the murder of Porphyria can examine her as the mental illness as 'she was mine, mine,' suggests she is his possession, his repetition suggests that he has difficulty asserting himself, familiar to someone who is losing grip or control, just as Porphyria tries to persuade him to give into her, suggesting he is struggling for control as in comparison with Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, he himself is an uncanny figure as without a conscious thought, he kills her. Critic Barry L Popowich suggests the "the seductress embodies a disease" ‘seductress’ embodies Porphyria as a taunt to the man here, as she is a ‘disease’ (that furthers Porphyria as the mental illness) it can be suggested that Popowich feels Porphyria wants her lover to kill her as she seduces him to do so. ‘No pain felt she; I am quite sure she felt no pain’ To strange her with a lock of her own hair can suggest how she is not really physically there, as he has not used a weapon to murder her, additionally she allows him to do this to her which is furthering the idea she is a taunt and a disease, and it is also suggested that he is so aware of what he is doing, and sure of himself as he is confident she felt no pain ‘no pain felt she’.
Overall, the idea that humans, raw, unsuppressed and without a conscious thought, furthers the uncanny element in The Self as without a conscious thought, as seen here, the self is destructive and of terror.

Lastly, the uncanny aspect of the Marquis is fair to mention as he is of a contrast like that of Dr. Jekyll, a well-respected man who has a mysterious enigma about him, a dark side. His aristocratic background and wealth would put anybody at calm; however his lack of expression, his dark qualities and his sadistic and collection of violent pornography reveals a mysterious and contrasting aspect to the Marquis. His eyes have an ‘absolute absence of light’ this can be suggested as it is picked up on by his new wife, how strange this is, it can be remarked he has no life, no light in his eyes can suggest he is a dull, unmoving and perhaps a bored character, his eyes can be remarked or compared like that of a doll eyes, lifeless, but alive, almost without a soul, suggesting the uncanny aspect in the Marquis. ‘the face underneath this mask’ is another early remark on her husband, suggesting how straight away she can notice his lack of conscious, ‘this’ suggests perhaps he has had more than one mask, and this is just simply another disguise; it is also fair to mention that masks are an uncanny object but also can be remarked as frightening, as the wife feels towards her husband, she can only hope he will reveal his true self. Lastly, the comparison of the ‘sentient vegetable', and a ‘lily’ are strange comparisons that show beauty but unawareness, something presented for funerals suggest the foreshadowing of her husband, but something that stains you also foreshadows, with the comparison of the vegetable to the lily it can be stated it’s hard to relate to the Marquis, as an uncanny it is hard to pin him down. All in all, the Marquis is a mysterious man that relates the uncanny to the Self.


To mention, primal and animalistic qualities have come so far as for us humans to learn how to control our desires, we repress our ID from a Freudian perspective for the sake of adaptation to society, so how do we react when one chooses to unsuppress their raw animalistic emotions?
The works of Angela Carter in The Bloody Chamber examine how the Marquis represents an animalistic and raw self that can support the claim of the atrocity that raw animalistic qualities represent the self as a gothic convention. The Marquis, an aristocratic businessman, therefore he is seen by society as a great man has he is someone of importance and wealth, addressed by his 'wealth' and 'gold'. The title Marquis is the only association with the man in this story, suggesting like an animal he has no name, just a title, and that he is also more of an unknown and hidden character as we only have one name for him. 'Marquis' translates to a French nobleman of high status and politics further suggesting his claim to high society. The appearance of the Marquis consists of dark, manly and rugged features that suggest the unknown and animalistic qualities of the Marquis. 'opulent male scent' is a suggestion that his 'scent' is familiar to what an animal would have, and his maleness may suggest his dominance and his opulence may try to hide his animalistic qualities by wealth and fortune but his raw animalistic qualities shine through. The 'dark mane' is a further implication of his qualities resembling like a lion, a lion's dark mane suggests the dark secretive quality and his 'mane' like a lion he is a dominant king of the land analysing that his wealth and status suggests the higher authority. His raw sexuality is a further addition to the Marquis' animalistic behaviour. Marquis de Sade was a great influence on the works of Angela Carter and who the Marquis is instantly based on, Sade (sadism) believed violence and sexuality were entangled, which suggests the behaviour of the Marquis in The Bloody Chamber. 'examined her limb, by limb' is a suggestion that the marquis is preying on his young new wife like a piece of meat, as if he is the lion that is admiring his prey sexually but predatory. "little nun" and "white, enclosed quietude"  The are quotes that suggest the contrast between the marquis and the 'little nun' as he calls, her, she white and virginal, him dark and mysterious. Majority of the male characters in the stories of Angela Carter have a beast-like or are animals themselves this furthers the indication that the Marquis is an uncanny human as he is a human of wealth which is comfort to society, however his raw animalistic and murderous behaviour distances him from the norm of society's behaviour. CRITIC QUOTE

In addition, the works of Dr. Jekyll and Mr Hyde present how animal qualities can appear throughout the characters of the novel. Dr Jekyll states in 'Henry Jekyll's Full Statement of the Case' how humans are concepted of good and evil and the splitting of those selves resulted in Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. He states that the Hyde was too strong, pure evil where as Dr Jekyll was a mix of good and criminal, it shows he had a conscious in contrast to Mr. Hyde. CRITICAL QUOTE? In chapter 10 it is remarked 'the animal within me licking the chops of memory;' the 'animal' being Hyde, this suggests both selves enjoy the thought of devilish thoughts, and like an animal they reminisce back onto it like a piece of meat, 'licking' to savour the moment and as if Mr Hyde is patiently waiting to release; this is where Dr Jekyll spontaneously combusts into Mr Hyde without aid of a potion, this suggests Mr Hyde has the dominance and control over Dr Jekyll at this point to control the former self. This overall is suggesting the dark and animalistic side can easily triumph over the self, which further suggests the conception that the self is a gothic convention.


Lastly, the works of Browning portray how predominantly the men in his poems identify with the animal side within and how it plays into effect of the self. The poem 'The Last Duchess' identifies a Duke in search for his next duchess, a murderous, jealous, and in need of a wife. The Duke identities as a man who intends to have ownership over his women, 'my duchess' his use of 'my' is suggesting his dominance is like that of an animal, as he needs to control them, or else they die. In Victorian society it fits the mold to try and control women, however as it is pieced together that the Duchesses death was brought on by the Duke's doings it is fair to say that the no remorse killing of his wife resembles that of an animal, as they do not feel remorse as such compared to humans, it is human to kill your wife, and disregard for another, younger mate. It is also suggested that his search for a younger female could be for fertility, as an animal would do in search for a mate. 'Her husband's presence only' on the detail and the portrayal of the portrait further suggests how the poem is through only the Duke's perspective on these events, which suggests his overall now dominance now that she is dead, as well as how unreliable the story is pictured, but as he tries to present himself in a great light 'my gift of a nine-hundred-years-old name' it is evident that the Duke is a possessive, murderous man of intention of worshipping his nobility and status, further showing how his murderous intentions and seeking of a controlled, dominated wife identifies how these qualities are representative of how the self is a dark convention of the gothic literature.

Thursday, 6 March 2014

Assessment of St.John


Ruby Canary



St.John is said to be a cold representation of Rochester, he believes in a moral christian way of life, where love and lust has no part to play in a christian life such as his, in much contrast to Rochester who has many romances with women from all over the world, Rochester embraces passion as well as his byronic personality.

Is St.John a good man? St.John is a good man in terms of his ambition, he is driven to becoming a missionary and devotes his whole life towards it; given the time and place a missionary was seen as being a positive thing to do with your life from the English upper/middle-class aristocracy, however is converting/forcing a culture/race of people such as those in India to a strange and unknown religion something moral? I believe that the drive of St.John is described as something that is definitely strong, however his set of morales seem ignorant and forceful, as he believes that Christianity is the way forward and that people in India should conform to his preach of Christ and convert, making St.John a terrible man in his belief in that he believes everybody should think a certain way, in the way of christ, life without passion and things deemed wrong in christianity.

In terms of association between Jane and St.John, Jane describes St.John as a cold man, well she describes his eyes as 'rock-like' and icy, in comparison Jane describes Rochester's eyes as 'passionate', 'flashing' and 'flaming', this suggests the emotions that the two have, Rochester is a man of warmth, heat and passion and St.John is cold as if he has no emotion or passion. A marriage with Rochester is what Jane desires, she would marry for love and passion but marriage to St.John as he states in the book would be formal and simply practical, as he again believes that passion isn't an associate of life in marriage. Is St.John a bad man for believing this? I believe that St.John is entitled to his belief and opinion of marriage, he is deeply in love with a beautiful woman, but he turns to Jane for a wife, as he is so set in his belief that marriage is something practical, and he believes that plain Jane will fit for the job, I don't believe the man has no emotion, but he believes and devotes himself to a life of strong will and Christianity, which may be his ideal way of life that keeps him contemp.



In conclusion, St.John is a good man in that he is driven and dedicated to God and his religion, he wishes to spread the word of God, but because of this he is passionless and feels a life of love wouldn’t be acceptable in God’s eyes, and ignorant in that he feels he should spread the word of God and force religion onto a foreign country.